🔗 Share this article

T reprieve resulting from the ceasefire in Gaza is profound. Across Israel, the release of captives held alive has sparked widespread elation. Throughout Gaza and the West Bank, festivities have commenced as as many as 2,000 Palestinian detainees start to be released – though distress remains due to ambiguity about which prisoners are returning and where they will be sent. Throughout Gaza's northern regions, residents can now go back to dig through rubble for the remains of an believed 10,000 missing people.

Peace Breakthrough Contrary to Earlier Odds

Only three weeks ago, the likelihood of a ceasefire appeared remote. Yet it has taken effect, and on Monday Donald Trump departed Jerusalem, where he was cheered in the Knesset, to Sharm el-Sheikh in Egypt. There, he participated in a prestigious diplomatic gathering of over 20 world leaders, among them Sir Keir Starmer. The diplomatic roadmap begun there is scheduled to proceed at a conference in the UK. The US president, cooperating with international partners, managed to secure this deal take place – despite, not because of, Israel’s prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

Aspirations for Sovereignty Tempered by Past Precedents

Aspirations that the deal signifies the opening phase toward Palestinian statehood are reasonable – but, considering historical precedent, slightly idealistic. It provides no definite route to sovereignty for Palestinians and endangers separating, for the near term, Gaza from the West Bank. Furthermore the utter devastation this war has caused. The absence of any timeframe for Palestinian self-determination in the US initiative contradicts boastful mentions, in his Knesset speech, to the “epochal beginning” of a “golden age”.

The American leader was unable to refrain from polarising and personalising the deal in his speech.

In a time of respite – with the liberation of detainees, halt in fighting and restart of aid – he chose to recast it as a morality play in which he alone reclaimed Israel’s prestige after supposed treachery by former US presidents Obama and Biden. This even as the Biden administration previously having undertaken a analogous arrangement: a ceasefire tied to relief entry and ultimate diplomatic discussions.

Meaningful Agency Vital for Authentic Resolution

A proposal that withholds one side substantive control cannot produce sustainable agreement. The ceasefire and relief shipments are to be embraced. But this is not currently diplomatic advancement. Without processes securing Palestinian engagement and command over their own organizations, any deal threatens freezing domination under the discourse of peace.

Relief Imperatives and Rebuilding Obstacles

Gaza’s people urgently require relief assistance – and sustenance and pharmaceuticals must be the primary focus. But restoration must not be delayed. Amid 60 million tonnes of rubble, Palestinians need support repairing dwellings, educational facilities, healthcare facilities, mosques and other organizations shattered by Israel’s military operation. For Gaza’s interim government to prosper, funding must arrive promptly and safety deficiencies be addressed.

Like a great deal of Donald Trump's diplomatic proposal, allusions to an multinational security contingent and a suggested “peace council” are disturbingly unclear.

Worldwide Endorsement and Potential Developments

Strong worldwide endorsement for the Palestinian leadership, allowing it to succeed Hamas, is likely the most promising prospect. The tremendous pain of the previous 24 months means the ethical argument for a resolution to the conflict is possibly more pressing than ever. But while the ceasefire, the repatriation of the detainees and vow by Hamas to “remove weapons from” Gaza should be recognized as positive steps, the president's track record offers minimal cause to believe he will accomplish – or feel bound to endeavor. Immediate respite does not imply that the likelihood of a Palestinian state has been advanced.